From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM MMU: separate invlpg code form kvm_mmu_pte_write()
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 17:31:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE28C72.7040206@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE2818A.5000301@cn.fujitsu.com>
Let invlpg not depends on kvm_mmu_pte_write path, later patch will need
this feature
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 8ab1a49..5e32751 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2318,6 +2318,10 @@ static bool is_rsvd_bits_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpte, int level)
return (gpte & vcpu->arch.mmu.rsvd_bits_mask[bit7][level-1]) != 0;
}
+static void mmu_guess_page_from_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
+ u64 gpte);
+static void mmu_release_page_from_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
#define PTTYPE 64
#include "paging_tmpl.h"
#undef PTTYPE
@@ -2631,6 +2635,14 @@ static void mmu_guess_page_from_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn = pfn;
}
+static void mmu_release_page_from_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ if (!is_error_pfn(vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn)) {
+ kvm_release_pfn_clean(vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn);
+ vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn = bad_pfn;
+ }
+}
+
static void kvm_mmu_access_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
{
u64 *spte = vcpu->arch.last_pte_updated;
@@ -2663,12 +2675,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
int flooded = 0;
int npte;
int r;
- int invlpg_counter;
pgprintk("%s: gpa %llx bytes %d\n", __func__, gpa, bytes);
- invlpg_counter = atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.invlpg_counter);
-
/*
* Assume that the pte write on a page table of the same type
* as the current vcpu paging mode. This is nearly always true
@@ -2701,8 +2710,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
mmu_guess_page_from_pte_write(vcpu, gpa, gentry);
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
- if (atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.invlpg_counter) != invlpg_counter)
- gentry = 0;
kvm_mmu_access_page(vcpu, gfn);
kvm_mmu_free_some_pages(vcpu);
++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_pte_write;
@@ -2779,10 +2786,7 @@ restart:
}
kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, "post pte write");
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
- if (!is_error_pfn(vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn)) {
- kvm_release_pfn_clean(vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn);
- vcpu->arch.update_pte.pfn = bad_pfn;
- }
+ mmu_release_page_from_pte_write(vcpu);
}
int kvm_mmu_unprotect_page_virt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 89d66ca..93ee2d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -462,11 +462,11 @@ out_unlock:
static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = NULL;
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
- gpa_t pte_gpa = -1;
- int level;
- u64 *sptep;
- int need_flush = 0;
+ gfn_t gfn = -1;
+ u64 *sptep = NULL, gentry;
+ int invlpg_counter, level, offset = 0, need_flush = 0;
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -475,15 +475,14 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
sptep = iterator.sptep;
if (is_last_spte(*sptep, level)) {
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
- int offset, shift;
+ int shift;
+ sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
shift = PAGE_SHIFT -
(PT_LEVEL_BITS - PT64_LEVEL_BITS) * level;
+ gfn = sp->gfn;
offset = sp->role.quadrant << shift;
-
- pte_gpa = (sp->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
- pte_gpa += (sptep - sp->spt) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
+ offset += (sptep - sp->spt) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)) {
rmap_remove(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
@@ -492,6 +491,7 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
need_flush = 1;
}
__set_spte(sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
+ sp->active_count++;
break;
}
@@ -502,16 +502,34 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
if (need_flush)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
- atomic_inc(&vcpu->kvm->arch.invlpg_counter);
-
+ invlpg_counter = atomic_add_return(1, &vcpu->kvm->arch.invlpg_counter);
spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
- if (pte_gpa == -1)
+ if (gfn == -1)
return;
if (mmu_topup_memory_caches(vcpu))
return;
- kvm_mmu_pte_write(vcpu, pte_gpa, NULL, sizeof(pt_element_t), 0);
+ if (kvm_read_guest_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, &gentry, offset,
+ sizeof(pt_element_t)))
+ return;
+
+ mmu_guess_page_from_pte_write(vcpu, gfn_to_gpa(gfn) + offset, gentry);
+ spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ sp->active_count--;
+ if (sp->role.invalid) {
+ if (!sp->active_count)
+ kvm_mmu_free_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
+ goto unlock_exit;
+ }
+ if (atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.invlpg_counter) == invlpg_counter &&
+ sp->role.level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
+ ++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_pte_updated;
+ FNAME(update_pte)(vcpu, sp, sptep, &gentry);
+ }
+unlock_exit:
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+ mmu_release_page_from_pte_write(vcpu);
}
static gpa_t FNAME(gva_to_gpa)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t vaddr, u32 access,
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4BE2818A.5000301@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-05-06 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM MMU: split kvm_sync_page() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM MMU: don't write-protect if have new mapping to unsync page Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM MMU: allow more page become unsync at gfn mapping time Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM MMU: allow more page become unsync at getting sp time Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM MMU: rename 'root_count' to 'active_count' Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-07 3:57 ` [PATCH v5 " Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM MMU: support keeping sp live while it's out of protection Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-07 3:58 ` [PATCH v5 " Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:31 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-05-06 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM MMU: no need atomic operation for 'invlpg_counter' Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-06 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM MMU: optimize sync/update unsync-page Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE28C72.7040206@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).