From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Subject: Re: migration fails with virtio-blk
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:34:39 +0400
Message-ID: <4BE851BF.7060003@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
References: <4BE7D695.9020002@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
To: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:38193 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753384Ab0EJSel (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 10 May 2010 14:34:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BE7D695.9020002@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

10.05.2010 13:49, Michael Tokarev =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> Apparently there's an issue with migration when
> virtio-blk is in use at the time migration occurs.
>
> See Debian bug #580649 for details:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D580649
>
> In short: 2.6.26 (guest) + 0.12.3 + virtio-blk fails.
> 2.6.32 guest works, 0.11 works, non-virtio-blk works.

It looks like a problem reported on qemu-devel
list should fix the issue here:
http://marc.info/?l=3Dqemu-devel&m=3D127350821419989

Testing...  It wont be fast because I want to hear
from the OP.

Thanks!

/mjt