From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] pvclock misc fixes - v4.
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:33:56 +0300
Message-ID: <4BEA4BD4.6070207@redhat.com>
References: <1273594667-17175-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4BEA21A1.8040702@redhat.com> <AFD76714-2559-4281-AB61-EA5C6395C13A@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AFD76714-2559-4281-AB61-EA5C6395C13A@suse.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 05/12/2010 08:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> How about stable queuing of this one?
>

Only after this gets some serious field testing.  I'm not happy to trade 
a known issue for an unknown regression.  While I don't expect any 
problems with the patchset, testing has often proven me wrong.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.