From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Consolidate vcpu ioctl locking Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:03:10 +0300 Message-ID: <4BEBEA7E.80202@redhat.com> References: <1273749459-622-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4BEBEA25.8080309@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, carsteno@de.ibm.com To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45445 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754911Ab0EMMDR (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 08:03:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BEBEA25.8080309@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/13/2010 03:01 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/13/2010 02:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> Mind to give a high level overview on where you're moving which locks? >> > > Um, looks like I forgot to fill in the patchset header. Sorry. Gar, I actually wrote it but forgot to save the file. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function