From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: MMU: don't write-protect if have new mapping to unsync page
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 18:52:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BEE7CF2.3080502@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BEE7CAC.5020603@cn.fujitsu.com>
Two cases maybe happen in kvm_mmu_get_page() function:
- one case is, the goal sp is already in cache, if the sp is unsync,
we only need update it to assure this mapping is valid, but not
mark it sync and not write-protect sp->gfn since it not broke unsync
rule(one shadow page for a gfn)
- another case is, the goal sp not existed, we need create a new sp
for gfn, i.e, gfn (may)has another shadow page, to keep unsync rule,
we should sync(mark sync and write-protect) gfn's unsync shadow page.
After enabling multiple unsync shadows, we sync those shadow pages
only when the new sp not allow to become unsync(also for the unsyc
rule, the new rule is: allow all pte page become unsync)
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 549255d..97c5217 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned index;
unsigned quadrant;
struct hlist_head *bucket;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, *unsync_sp = NULL;
struct hlist_node *node, *tmp;
role = vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role;
@@ -1355,20 +1355,30 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, tmp, bucket, hash_link)
if (sp->gfn == gfn) {
if (sp->unsync)
- if (kvm_sync_page(vcpu, sp))
- continue;
+ unsync_sp = sp;
if (sp->role.word != role.word)
continue;
+ if (!direct && unsync_sp &&
+ kvm_sync_page_transient(vcpu, unsync_sp)) {
+ unsync_sp = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+
mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
if (sp->unsync_children) {
set_bit(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, &vcpu->requests);
kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
- }
+ } else if (sp->unsync)
+ kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
+
trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false);
return sp;
}
+ if (!direct && unsync_sp)
+ kvm_sync_page(vcpu, unsync_sp);
+
++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss;
sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_page(vcpu, parent_pte);
if (!sp)
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-15 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-15 10:51 [PATCH 1/3] KVM: MMU: split kvm_sync_page() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-15 10:52 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-05-15 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: MMU: only update unsync page in invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2010-05-19 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: MMU: split kvm_sync_page() function Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BEE7CF2.3080502@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).