From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for May 18 Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:25:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4BF2BF73.5070901@codemonkey.ws> References: <20100518032346.GK4992@x200.localdomain> <4BF29BCF.4050805@codemonkey.ws> <20100518140927.GJ8328@redhat.com> <4BF2A55E.5030001@codemonkey.ws> <20100518145541.GM8328@redhat.com> <20100518130040.68c93f39@redhat.com> <20100518161654.GU8328@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.221.171]:58681 "EHLO mail-qy0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754543Ab0ERQZ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 12:25:26 -0400 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so8885853qyk.5 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:25:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100518161654.GU8328@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/18/2010 11:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The must haves are blockdev_add, and the commit/delvm/loadvm/savevm > stuff, since they're already in use. > > The problem I fear is that we're aiming for a moving target here. > > eg, by the time QEMU 0.13 comes out libvirt may have received patches > using yet more QEMU monitor commands. libvirt could just stop taking patches that use monitor commands. There's no way we're going to break the deadlock if we don't work together here. Regards, Anthony Liguori