From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-kvm] device-assignment: add config fd qdev property Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:27:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4BF465BC.5080102@codemonkey.ws> References: <20100519190041.GK28275@x200.localdomain> <4BF4398B.50902@codemonkey.ws> <20100519211030.GL28275@x200.localdomain> <4BF45D2B.8020000@codemonkey.ws> <20100519215927.GB31009@x200.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson To: Chris Wright Return-path: Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:38762 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750943Ab0ESW1N (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 18:27:13 -0400 Received: by gwaa20 with SMTP id a20so2180254gwa.19 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:27:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100519215927.GB31009@x200.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/19/2010 04:59 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> I'm not sure I have a better suggestion though. >>>> >>> Anything else requires inventing some new commandline options and monitor >>> comnmands (-pcidevice anyone? ;-). I'm not sure the benefit, esp with >>> hopes of moving to uio. >>> >> Yeah, I think device passthrough is going to require new command >> line syntax to be more qemu friendly... >> > Right, and I think we should do that in the context of redoing the > infrastructure. What do you think? > Yeah, as long as it's understood that this in on the horizon (particularly on the libvirt side). Regards, Anthony Liguori > thanks, > -chris >