From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Bug Day - June 1st, 2010 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 00:29:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF46639.9080109@amd.com> References: <4BF316E3.6020002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100519014531.GE2318@shareable.org> <4BF3E31E.70702@codemonkey.ws> <4BF3E577.8050005@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Jamie Lokier , qemu-devel , kvm-devel To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: Received: from tx2ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.15]:59795 "EHLO TX2EHSOBE010.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750943Ab0ESW2v (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 18:28:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BF3E577.8050005@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael Tokarev wrote: > ... > > Also, thanks to Andre Przywara, whole winNT thing works but it requires > -cpu qemu64,level=1 (or level=2 or =3), -- _not_ with default CPU. This > is also testing, but it's not obvious what to do witht the result... Can't we use the file based CPU models for that? Actually it looks like a template config file for certain guest operation systems (like -vga std -net nic,model=ne2k_pci for older Windows version) make sense. These could include all quirks that we find on the way. BTW: Does anyone knows what the problem with Windows95/98 on KVM is? I tried some tracing today, but couldn't find a hint. Regards, Andre. -- Andre Przywara AMD-Operating System Research Center (OSRC), Dresden, Germany Tel: +49 351 488-3567-12