* Bug tracking?
@ 2010-05-21 12:45 Michael Tokarev
2010-05-21 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2010-05-21 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM list
So, what's the current state of the bug tracking system?
As far as I can see, qemu is moving to launchpad.
Where qemu-kvm-related issues should be submitted nowadays?
Thanks!
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug tracking?
2010-05-21 12:45 Bug tracking? Michael Tokarev
@ 2010-05-21 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-21 15:56 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-05-21 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Tokarev; +Cc: KVM list
On 05/21/2010 07:45 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> So, what's the current state of the bug tracking system?
> As far as I can see, qemu is moving to launchpad.
> Where qemu-kvm-related issues should be submitted nowadays?
Kernel issues should be filed in bugzilla.kernel.org.
qemu issues should be filed in LaunchPad.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Thanks!
>
> /mjt
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug tracking?
2010-05-21 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori
@ 2010-05-21 15:56 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-21 16:12 ` Michael Tokarev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-05-21 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Michael Tokarev, KVM list
On 05/21/2010 06:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/21/2010 07:45 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> So, what's the current state of the bug tracking system?
>> As far as I can see, qemu is moving to launchpad.
>> Where qemu-kvm-related issues should be submitted nowadays?
>
> Kernel issues should be filed in bugzilla.kernel.org.
>
> qemu issues should be filed in LaunchPad.
>
qemu-kvm issues, even if not present in upstream qemu, should be filed
in launchpad (but clearly marked to be qemu-kvm specific).
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug tracking?
2010-05-21 15:56 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-05-21 16:12 ` Michael Tokarev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2010-05-21 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Anthony Liguori, KVM list
21.05.2010 19:56, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/21/2010 06:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 05/21/2010 07:45 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> So, what's the current state of the bug tracking system?
>>> As far as I can see, qemu is moving to launchpad.
>>> Where qemu-kvm-related issues should be submitted nowadays?
>>
>> Kernel issues should be filed in bugzilla.kernel.org.
>>
>> qemu issues should be filed in LaunchPad.
>
> qemu-kvm issues, even if not present in upstream qemu, should be filed
> in launchpad (but clearly marked to be qemu-kvm specific).
Aha. That makes perfect sense now. Thanks!
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-21 16:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-21 12:45 Bug tracking? Michael Tokarev
2010-05-21 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-21 15:56 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-21 16:12 ` Michael Tokarev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox