From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for May 18 Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:51:28 +0300 Message-ID: <4BFB9DA0.3070809@redhat.com> References: <20100518032346.GK4992@x200.localdomain> <201005180159.38787.iggy@theiggy.com> <4BF29BA4.50006@codemonkey.ws> <20100519082016.GA2344@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Brian Jackson , Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21597 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756188Ab0EYJvj (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 05:51:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100519082016.GA2344@infradead.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/19/2010 11:20 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > It's time we get a proper bugzilla.qemu.org for both qemu and qemu-kvm > that can be used sanely. If you ask nicely you might even get a virtual > instance of bugzilla.kernel.org which works quite nicely. > That would be my preference too but there's a limit to how much we can juggle the bug database around. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function