From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] some kvm-kmod issues
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:52:51 -1000
Message-ID: <4BFCA923.602@redhat.com>
References: <4BFC956D.6070808@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59138 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750963Ab0EZEwy (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 26 May 2010 00:52:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BFC956D.6070808@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 05/25/2010 05:28 PM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> I found some issues with kvm-kmod from recently pulled tree on F13 
> (2.6.33) kernel.  I am not 100% sure the version numbers are right in 
> all of these fixes, but at least it compiles and seems to run VMs again.
>
> The FPU change and the iommu change are, well, rather scary.  They 
> could use some eyes and suggestions.
>
> Zach

Well, this apparently doesn't work.  The module builds, load, and runs 
non-paging mode fine, but things appear to go haywire just around when 
paging gets activated.  Any recent changes in the module (large page, 
TLB contract) that might be relying on addition kernel support?

Or just too long since I pulled mainline.  I'll try a bsect and see 
where I get.

Zach