From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zamsden@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Documentation/kvm/msr.txt
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:15:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFE2A2F.50209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274897088-8587-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
On 05/26/2010 09:04 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch adds a file that documents the usage of KVM-specific
> MSRs.
>
>
Looks good. A few comments:
> +
> +Custom MSR list
> +--------
> +
> +The current supported Custom MSR list is:
> +
> +MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK: 0x11
> +
> + data: physical address of a memory area.
Which must be in guest RAM (i.e., don't point it somewhere random and
expect the hypervisor to allocate it for you).
Must be aligned to 4 bytes (we don't enforce it though).
> +
> +MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME: 0x12
> +
> + data: physical address of a memory area. This memory is expected to
> + hold a copy of the following structure:
>
In guest RAM. What are the alignment restrictions? I don't think we
can restrict to less than 4 bytes without breaking guests retroactively.
> +
> + struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
> + u32 version;
> + u32 pad0;
> + u64 tsc_timestamp;
> + u64 system_time;
> + u32 tsc_to_system_mul;
> + s8 tsc_shift;
> + u8 flags;
> + u8 pad[2];
> + } __attribute__((__packed__)); /* 32 bytes */
> +
> + whose data will be filled in by the hypervisor periodically. Only one
> + write, or registration, is needed for each VCPU. The interval between
> + updates of this structure is arbitrary, and implementation-dependent.
> +
> + version: guest has to check version before and after grabbing
> + time information, and check that they are both equal and even.
> + An odd version indicates an in-progress update.
> +
> + tsc_timestamp: the tsc value at the current VCPU, at the time
> + of the update of this structure. Guests can subtract this value
> + from current tsc to derive a notion of elapsed time since the
> + structure update.
> +
> + system_time: the current system time at the time this structure
> + was last updated. Unit is nanoseconds.
>
What is the baseline for system_time? Guest boot?
> +
> + tsc_to_system_mul: a function of the tsc frequency. One has
> + to multiply any tsc-related quantity by this value to get
> + a value in nanoseconds, besides dividing by 2^tsc_shift
> +
> + tsc_shift: cycle to nanosecond divider, as a power of two, to
> + allow for shift rights. One has to shift right any tsc-related
> + quantity by this value to get a value in nanoseconds, besides
> + multiplying by tsc_to_system_mul.
>
Would be good to write down the formula for calculating time here.
> +
> + flags: bits in this field indicate extended capabilities
> + coordinated between the guest and the hypervisor. Availability
> + of specific flags has to be checked in 0x40000001 cpuid leaf.
> + Refer to cpuid.txt for details.
>
Need to document bit 0 here for completeness. cpuid.txt documents how
to discover it, here we document how to use it.
> +
> + Availability of this MSR must be checked via bit 0 in 0x4000001 cpuid
> + leaf prior to usage.
> +
> + This MSR falls outside the reserved KVM range, and may be removed in the
> + future. Its usage is deprecated.
> +
> +MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK_NEW: 0x4b564d00
> +
> + data and functioning: same as MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK. Use this instead.
> +
> + Availability of this MSR must be checked via bit 3 in 0x4000001 cpuid
> + leaf prior to usage.
> +
> +MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME_NEW: 0x4b564d01
> +
> + data and functioning: same as MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME. Use this instead.
> +
> + Availability of this MSR must be checked via bit 3 in 0x4000001 cpuid
> + leaf prior to usage.
> +
>
Please detail the suggested algorithm for using the msrs (new then old).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 18:04 [PATCH] Add Documentation/kvm/msr.txt Glauber Costa
2010-05-26 18:35 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-26 18:59 ` Glauber Costa
2010-05-27 8:15 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-05-27 16:02 ` Glauber Costa
2010-05-27 20:13 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-05-27 20:36 ` Glauber Costa
2010-05-27 21:02 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-05-28 0:10 ` Glauber Costa
2010-05-28 4:10 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-05-30 9:14 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-31 13:49 ` Glauber Costa
2010-05-31 14:03 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFE2A2F.50209@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).