From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] qemu: kvm: Enable XSAVE live migration support Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:48:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4C18F25E.8070704@siemens.com> References: <1276231009-6060-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <20100614203926.GA6316@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sheng Yang , Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:21317 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754629Ab0FPPtI (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:49:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100614203926.GA6316@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:36:49PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang >> --- >> qemu-kvm-x86.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> qemu-kvm.c | 24 +++++++++++ >> qemu-kvm.h | 28 +++++++++++++ >> target-i386/cpu.h | 5 ++ >> target-i386/kvm.c | 2 + >> target-i386/machine.c | 20 +++++++++ >> 6 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks. Oops, late remark: Why introducing this feature against qemu-kvm instead of upstream? Doesn't this just generate additional conversion work and the risk of divergence to upstream in the migration protocol? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux