From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: add test for pusha and popa instructions
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:48:14 +0800
Message-ID: <4C1ED2EE.4010604@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <4C16D0A0.2090203@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C16D165.8020406@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C16E107.8010007@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C1DD16E.8060600@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:55325 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755962Ab0FUCui (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:50:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4C1DD16E.8060600@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>


> On 06/15/2010 05:10 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>   
>> This patch add test for pusha and popa instructions.
>>
>>   
>>     
> Did you test the test? These tests require
> 'emulate_invalid_guest_state=1' and to run on Intel to actually test
> anything. You can check with ftrace whether kvm actually emulated
> pusha/popa.
>   

Yes, I did test this case, and checked kvm actually emulated
pusha/popa by add printk to kernel source.

>
>