From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: add test for pusha and popa instructions Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:15:17 +0300 Message-ID: <4C1F65E5.3080104@redhat.com> References: <4C16D0A0.2090203@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C16D165.8020406@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C16E107.8010007@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C1DD16E.8060600@redhat.com> <4C1ED2EE.4010604@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Wei Yongjun Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62376 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339Ab0FUNPX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:15:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C1ED2EE.4010604@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/21/2010 05:48 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote: >> >> Did you test the test? These tests require >> 'emulate_invalid_guest_state=1' and to run on Intel to actually test >> anything. You can check with ftrace whether kvm actually emulated >> pusha/popa. >> >> > Yes, I did test this case, and checked kvm actually emulated > pusha/popa by add printk to kernel source. > I see, thanks. Anyway Marcelo already applied it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function