Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: cleanup: remove kvm_get_dirty_log()

[Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>]

(2010/06/23 17:48), Avi Kivity wrote:

>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> index 801d9f3..bea6f7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>> @@ -1185,28 +1185,43 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> ulong ga, ga_end;
>> - int is_dirty = 0;
>> - int r;
>> + unsigned long is_dirty = 0;
>> + int r, i;
>> unsigned long n;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>>
>> - r = kvm_get_dirty_log(kvm, log,&is_dirty);
>> - if (r)
>> + r = -EINVAL;
>> + if (log->slot>= KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + memslot =&kvm->memslots->memslots[log->slot];
>
> Not introduced by this patch, but shouldn't this use rcu_dereference()?
>
>

I was thinking like that, but sorry I don't know well about ppc.

My final goal is to make everything except

   /* If nothing is dirty, don't bother messing with page tables. */

part arch independent, so that we can concentrate on the truely
dirty logging things in the future.

So, making ppc code same as x86, rcu_dereference() for example , really
helps me.


Do you like this approach?

   Takuya