From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Looking at using KVM for embedded product Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:36:02 +0300 Message-ID: <4C21D582.1030602@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Shoes Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49471 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751493Ab0FWJgF (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:36:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/23/2010 04:22 AM, Tom Shoes wrote: > Need help to understand if KVM can be installed, configured and run > with c,d,e and f configuration > mentioned above? > > Also can I know > a. Is KVM code in Linux kernel 2.6.26 reliable? > It may be reliable or not, but it's certainly not supported. If you have problems or questions you're unlikely to receive support (on kvm or on Linux itself) on the mailing lists. > b. Will latest KVM code from linux-kvm.org run on Linux kernel 2.6.26? > You mean kvm-kmod? It may, but I recommend at least 2.6.27 (when mmu notifiers were introduced). > c. How can I find which version of KVM code is stable. Can I > find this using the version number > of the KVM release? > It depends on your needs. Many users are satisfied with the lastest stable branch (2.6.32.y or 2.6.34.y). Others want a distribution for longer term support. The adventuous run kvm.git master branch. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function