From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Looking at using KVM for embedded product Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:33:05 +0300 Message-ID: <4C221B21.6060306@redhat.com> References: <4C21D582.1030602@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list To: Tom Shoes Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47906 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752389Ab0FWOdI (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:33:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/23/2010 05:29 PM, Tom Shoes wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> > Thanks Avi for your response. > Re-adding mailing list to cc list. > Request for more clarification on the following: > > Is having no VGA adapter and using serial port as console an issue? > When I mean by issue, I am refering to issue while configuring or > running KVM and also its tools, library etc.. > Should not be a problem. >> Many users are satisfied with the lastest stable branch (2.6.32.y or 2.6.34.y). >> > Want to confirm if the KVM stable release go hand in hand with Linux kernel > release? > Yes - the kernel part. In fact there are no independent kvm releases any more, they're just ordinary kernel releases. The userspace part - qemu-kvm - is released independently (and has its own stable branch). >> You mean kvm-kmod? It may, but I recommend at least 2.6.27 (when mmu >> notifiers were introduced). >> > Thanks. Do you recommend 2.6.27 or any specific 2.6.27.y version. > The latest version. And I recommend 2.6.32.y or 2.6.34.y over 2.6.27. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function