From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Slow vmalloc in 2.6.35-rc3
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:19:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C232324.7070305@redhat.com> (raw)
I see really slow vmalloc performance on 2.6.35-rc3:
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
3) 3.581 us | vfree();
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 523.880 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.702 us | vfree();
3) ! 529.960 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 564.200 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.429 us | vfree();
3) ! 568.080 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 578.560 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.697 us | vfree();
3) ! 584.791 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 559.657 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.566 us | vfree();
3) ! 575.948 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 536.558 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.553 us | vfree();
3) ! 542.243 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 560.086 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.448 us | vfree();
3) ! 569.387 us | }
msr_io() is from arch/x86/kvm/x86.c, allocating at most 4K (yes it
should use kmalloc()). The memory is immediately vfree()ed. There are
96 entries in /proc/vmallocinfo, and the whole thing is single threaded
so there should be no contention.
Here's the perf report:
63.97% qemu
[kernel] [k] rb_next
|
--- rb_next
|
|--70.75%-- alloc_vmap_area
| __get_vm_area_node
| __vmalloc_node
| vmalloc
| |
| |--99.15%-- msr_io
| | kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl
| | kvm_vcpu_ioctl
| | vfs_ioctl
| | do_vfs_ioctl
| | sys_ioctl
| | system_call
| | __GI_ioctl
| | |
| | --100.00%--
0x1dfc4a8878e71362
| |
| --0.85%-- __kvm_set_memory_region
| kvm_set_memory_region
|
kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region
| kvm_vm_ioctl
| vfs_ioctl
| do_vfs_ioctl
| sys_ioctl
| system_call
| __GI_ioctl
|
--29.25%-- __get_vm_area_node
__vmalloc_node
vmalloc
|
|--98.89%-- msr_io
| kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl
| kvm_vcpu_ioctl
| vfs_ioctl
| do_vfs_ioctl
| sys_ioctl
| system_call
| __GI_ioctl
| |
| --100.00%--
0x1dfc4a8878e71362
It seems completely wrong - iterating 8 levels of a binary tree
shouldn't take half a millisecond.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-24 9:19 Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-24 15:14 ` Slow vmalloc in 2.6.35-rc3 Nick Piggin
2010-06-27 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 3:30 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C232324.7070305@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox