From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Looking at using KVM for embedded product
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:31:18 +0300
Message-ID: <4C235016.5040807@redhat.com>
References: <AANLkTik251DDKIB7REuCW4u6O7eB61BMD_NVVkp-aede@mail.gmail.com>	<4C21D582.1030602@redhat.com>	<AANLkTim56lf5-zCpejM1qzWojp7g__Plzv8-FSzJFuwE@mail.gmail.com>	<4C221B21.6060306@redhat.com> <AANLkTikRFsos2n5CYEXmAoGIUG97Ov0o9vzKR_I267G2@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Tom Shoes <shoestom@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62562 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755249Ab0FXMbV (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:31:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikRFsos2n5CYEXmAoGIUG97Ov0o9vzKR_I267G2@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 06/24/2010 03:21 PM, Tom Shoes wrote:
>> The userspace part - qemu-kvm - is released independently (and has its own
>> stable branch).
>>      
> Does a certain version of qemu-kvm go hand in hand with a certain
> version of KVM
> code in the Linux kernel release?
>
>    

No.

> Does the KVM community recommend or announce a version of qemu-kvm is
> good to go after testing with a KVM code it releases?
>    

No.  I generally test the latest qemu-kvm with the latest kvm.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function