From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:05:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C249B93.9040907@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
In no-direct mapping, we mark sp is 'direct' when we mapping the
guest's larger page, but its access is encoded form upper page-struct
entire not include the last mapping, it will cause access conflict.
For example, have this mapping:
[W]
/ PDE1 -> |---|
P[W] | | LPA
\ PDE2 -> |---|
[R]
P have two children, PDE1 and PDE2, both PDE1 and PDE2 mapping the
same lage page(LPA). The P's access is WR, PDE1's access is WR,
PDE2's access is RO(just consider read-write permissions here)
When guest access PDE1, we will create a direct sp for LPA, the sp's
access is from P, is W, then we will mark the ptes is W in this sp.
Then, guest access PDE2, we will find LPA's shadow page, is the same as
PDE's, and mark the ptes is RO.
So, if guest access PDE1, the incorrect #PF is occured.
Fixed by encode the last mapping access into direct shadow page
And, it also cleanup the code that directly get the last level's dirty flag
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 37c26cb..e46eb8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
gfn_t table_gfn;
int r;
int level;
+ bool dirty = is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level-1]);
pt_element_t curr_pte;
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
@@ -319,8 +320,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
gw->pte_access & access,
user_fault, write_fault,
- is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level-1]),
- ptwrite, level,
+ dirty, ptwrite, level,
gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
break;
}
@@ -335,10 +335,11 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
}
if (level <= gw->level) {
- int delta = level - gw->level + 1;
direct = 1;
- if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[level - delta]))
+ if (!dirty)
access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
+ access &= gw->pte_access;
+
/*
* It is a large guest pages backed by small host pages,
* So we set @direct(@sp->role.direct)=1, and set
--
1.6.1.2
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-25 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-06-25 12:05 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-06-28 9:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 9:49 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 10:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:13 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 7:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 7:35 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 8:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 9:04 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 9:13 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 9:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 7:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 7:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 8:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 9:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_topup_memory_cache_atomic() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 1:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 13:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29 8:07 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 11:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 0:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C249B93.9040907@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox