From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:13:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2883D3.2050606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C287332.5080803@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 06/28/2010 01:02 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>> Instead of adding a new bit, can you encode the protection in the direct
>> sp's access bits? So we'll have one sp for read-only or
>> writeable-but-not-dirty small pages, and another sp for
>> writeable-and-dirty small pages.
>>
>>
> It looks like it can't solve all problems, it fix the access corrupted,
> but will cause D bit losed:
>
> mapping A and mapping B both are writable-and-dirty, when mapping A write
> #PF occurs, the mapping is writable, then we can't set B's D bit anymore.
>
If B is writeable-and-dirty, then it's D bit is already set, and we
don't need to do anything.
If B is writeable-and-clean, then we'll have an spte pointing to a
read-only sp, so we'll get a write fault on access and an opportunity to
set the D bit.
> Anyway, i think we should re-intall the mapping when the state is changed. :-(
>
When the gpte is changed from read-only to writeable or from clean to
dirty, we need to update the spte, yes. But that's true for other sptes
as well, not just large gptes.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 9:43 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 9:49 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 10:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:13 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-29 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 7:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 7:35 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 8:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 9:04 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 9:13 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 9:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 7:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 7:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 8:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 9:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_topup_memory_cache_atomic() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 1:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 13:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29 8:07 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 11:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 0:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2883D3.2050606@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox