public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:51:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C29B3FD.8040802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C29A49C.8040804@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 06/29/2010 10:45 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>> - there was once talk that instead of folding pt_access and pte_access
>> together into the leaf sp->role.access, each sp level would have its own
>> access permissions.  In this case we don't even have to get a new direct
>> sp, only change the PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL spte to add write permissions
>> (all direct sp's would be writeable and permissions would be controlled
>> at their parent_pte level).  Of course that's a much bigger change than
>> this bug fix.
>>
>>      
> Yeah, i have considered this way, but it will change the shadow page's mapping
> way: it control the access at the upper level, but in the current code, we allow
> the upper level have the ALL_ACCESS and control the access right at the last level.
> It will break many things, such as write-protected...
>    

spte's access bits have dual purpose, both to map guest protection and 
for host protection (like for shadowed pages, or ksm pages).  So the 
last level sptes still need to consider host write protection.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:43   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  9:49     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:50   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 10:02     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:13       ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:17         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:06           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:35             ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:49               ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:04                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  9:13                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:13                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:38             ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:45               ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:51                 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-29  9:08                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:55   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_topup_memory_cache_atomic() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:17   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 13:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29  8:07     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 11:44       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30  0:58         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C29B3FD.8040802@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox