public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:08:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C29B81C.3040605@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C29B3FD.8040802@redhat.com>



Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/29/2010 10:45 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>> - there was once talk that instead of folding pt_access and pte_access
>>> together into the leaf sp->role.access, each sp level would have its own
>>> access permissions.  In this case we don't even have to get a new direct
>>> sp, only change the PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL spte to add write permissions
>>> (all direct sp's would be writeable and permissions would be controlled
>>> at their parent_pte level).  Of course that's a much bigger change than
>>> this bug fix.
>>>
>>>      
>> Yeah, i have considered this way, but it will change the shadow page's
>> mapping
>> way: it control the access at the upper level, but in the current
>> code, we allow
>> the upper level have the ALL_ACCESS and control the access right at
>> the last level.
>> It will break many things, such as write-protected...
>>    
> 
> spte's access bits have dual purpose, both to map guest protection and
> for host protection (like for shadowed pages, or ksm pages).  So the
> last level sptes still need to consider host write protection.
> 

Yeah, i see your mean, thanks, :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:43   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  9:49     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:50   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 10:02     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:13       ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:17         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:06           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:35             ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:49               ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:04                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  9:13                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:13                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:38             ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:45               ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:51                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:08                   ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:55   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_topup_memory_cache_atomic() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:17   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 13:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29  8:07     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 11:44       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30  0:58         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C29B81C.3040605@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox