From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:13:24 +0300 Message-ID: <4C29F174.9020902@redhat.com> References: <1277507817-626-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1277507817-626-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4C285D1C.5060508@redhat.com> <20417D40-9345-485B-9201-8B3722B7457F@suse.de> <4C286770.6010204@redhat.com> <4C29ED94.6060904@suse.de> <4C29EF8A.4070508@redhat.com> <4C29EFCC.3030303@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, KVM list , linuxppc-dev To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64850 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753326Ab0F2NNb (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:13:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C29EFCC.3030303@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/29/2010 04:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > Are we looking at the same link? Looks good to me there. > > We're probably looking at the same link but looking at different things. I'm whining about static u64 f() { ... } as opposed to the more sober static u64 f() { ... } for f in [kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte, kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte, kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long]. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function