public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] KVM: VMX: Execute WBINVD to keep data consistency with assigned devices
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:50:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C29FA39.8060908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100629133516.GC28951@amt.cnet>

On 06/29/2010 04:35 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>
>>> work_on_cpu() loop instead of smp_call_function_many(), to avoid executing
>>> wbinvd with interrupts disabled.
>>>        
>> Why?  wbinvd is not interruptible.
>>      
> Right. But still, smp_call_function_many() is going to busy-spin until
> the target CPUs finish their work, while work_on_cpu() will schedule.
>
>    

Good point.  So in the worst case we double the hit.

> Also the IPI request has to handled immediately, bypassing the
> scheduler.
>    

We're screwed on that point in any case, once wbinvd starts the 
scheduler is bypassed.

But work_on_cpu() has its own problems.  It creates a kthread (perhaps 
not too bad).  Maybe queue_work_on()?

btw, smp_call_function_many() appears not to run the function on the 
current cpu.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-28  3:36 [PATCH v3] KVM: VMX: Execute WBINVD to keep data consistency with assigned devices Sheng Yang
2010-06-28  3:56 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  6:42   ` Sheng Yang
2010-06-28  6:56     ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  6:56       ` Sheng Yang
2010-06-28  7:08         ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  7:41           ` Sheng Yang
2010-06-28  8:07             ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  8:42               ` [PATCH v4] " Sheng Yang
2010-06-28  9:27                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  9:31                   ` Gleb Natapov
2010-06-28  9:35                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  3:16                       ` [PATCH v5] " Sheng Yang
2010-06-29  9:39                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 10:32                           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-29 10:42                             ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 12:32                               ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-06-29 12:37                                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 10:14                         ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-06-29 10:44                           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 12:28                             ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-06-29 12:35                               ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 13:34                                 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-06-29 13:25                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29 13:28                           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 13:35                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29 13:50                               ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-29 14:31                                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-28  7:30       ` [PATCH v3] " Dong, Eddie
2010-06-28  8:04         ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  8:16           ` Dong, Eddie
2010-06-28  8:45             ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C29FA39.8060908@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox