From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/11] KVM: MMU: fix writable sync sp mapping
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:02:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2AF9FA.9020601@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
While we sync many unsync sp at one time(in mmu_sync_children()),
we may mapping the spte writable, it's dangerous, if one unsync
sp's mapping gfn is another unsync page's gfn.
For example:
SP1.pte[0] = P
SP2.gfn's pfn = P
[SP1.pte[0] = SP2.gfn's pfn]
First, we write protected SP1 and SP2, but SP1 and SP2 are still the
unsync sp.
Then, sync SP1 first, it will detect SP1.pte[0].gfn only has one unsync-sp,
that is SP2, so it will mapping it writable, but we plan to sync SP2 soon,
at this point, the SP2->unsync is not reliable since later we sync SP2 but
SP2->gfn is already writable.
So the final result is: SP2 is the sync page but SP2.gfn is writable.
This bug will corrupt guest's page table, fixed by mark read-only mapping
if the mapped gfn has shadow pages.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 045a0f9..24290f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1810,11 +1810,14 @@ static int mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
bool need_unsync = false;
for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(vcpu->kvm, s, gfn, node) {
+ if (!can_unsync)
+ return 1;
+
if (s->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
return 1;
if (!need_unsync && !s->unsync) {
- if (!can_unsync || !oos_shadow)
+ if (!oos_shadow)
return 1;
need_unsync = true;
}
--
1.6.1.2
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 8:02 Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-06-30 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/11] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/11] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 19:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 0:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/11] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(fetch)() functions Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 8/11] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 9/11] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 20:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 1:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 12:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 12:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2AF9FA.9020601@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox