From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/11] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:02:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2AFA25.20207@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2AF9FA.9020601@cn.fujitsu.com>
In no-direct mapping, we mark sp is 'direct' when we mapping the
guest's larger page, but its access is encoded form upper page-struct
entire not include the last mapping, it will cause access conflict.
For example, have this mapping:
[W]
/ PDE1 -> |---|
P[W] | | LPA
\ PDE2 -> |---|
[R]
P have two children, PDE1 and PDE2, both PDE1 and PDE2 mapping the
same lage page(LPA). The P's access is WR, PDE1's access is WR,
PDE2's access is RO(just consider read-write permissions here)
When guest access PDE1, we will create a direct sp for LPA, the sp's
access is from P, is W, then we will mark the ptes is W in this sp.
Then, guest access PDE2, we will find LPA's shadow page, is the same as
PDE's, and mark the ptes is RO.
So, if guest access PDE1, the incorrect #PF is occured.
Fixed by encode the last mapping access into direct shadow page
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 37c26cb..28c8493 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -339,6 +339,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
direct = 1;
if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[level - delta]))
access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
+ access &= gw->pte_access;
+
/*
* It is a large guest pages backed by small host pages,
* So we set @direct(@sp->role.direct)=1, and set
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 8:02 [PATCH v3 1/11] KVM: MMU: fix writable sync sp mapping Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:02 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-06-30 8:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/11] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 19:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 0:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/11] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(fetch)() functions Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 8/11] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 9/11] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 20:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 1:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 12:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 12:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2AFA25.20207@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox