From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:08:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2F2835.5060508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2F117C.2000006@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 07/03/2010 01:31 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>> See how the pte is reread inside fetch with mmu_lock held.
>>
>>
> It looks like something is broken in 'fetch' functions, this patch will
> fix it.
>
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: fix last level broken in FNAME(fetch)
>
> We read the guest level out of 'mmu_lock', sometimes, the host mapping is
> confusion. Consider this case:
>
> VCPU0: VCPU1
>
> Read guest mapping, assume the mapping is:
> GLV3 -> GLV2 -> GLV1 -> GFNA,
> And in the host, the corresponding mapping is
> HLV3 -> HLV2 -> HLV1(P=0)
>
> Write GLV1 and cause the
> mapping point to GFNB
> (May occur in pte_write or
> invlpg path)
>
> Mapping GLV1 to GFNA
>
> This issue only occurs in the last indirect mapping, since if the middle
> mapping is changed, the mapping will be zapped, then it will be detected
> in the FNAME(fetch) path, but when it map the last level, it not checked.
>
> Fixed by also check the last level.
>
>
I don't really see what is fixed. We already check the gpte. What's
special about the new scenario?
> @@ -322,6 +334,12 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
> level = iterator.level;
> sptep = iterator.sptep;
> if (iterator.level == hlevel) {
> + if (check&& level == gw->level&&
> + !FNAME(check_level_mapping)(vcpu, gw, hlevel)) {
> + kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + break;
> + }
> +
>
Now we check here...
> mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
> gw->pte_access& access,
> user_fault, write_fault,
> @@ -376,10 +394,10 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
> sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, table_gfn, addr, level-1,
> direct, access, sptep);
> if (!direct) {
> - r = kvm_read_guest_atomic(vcpu->kvm,
> - gw->pte_gpa[level - 2],
> - &curr_pte, sizeof(curr_pte));
> - if (r || curr_pte != gw->ptes[level - 2]) {
> + if (hlevel == level - 1)
> + check = false;
> +
> + if (!FNAME(check_level_mapping)(vcpu, gw, level - 1)) {
>
... and here? Why?
(looking at the code, we have a call to kvm_host_page_size() on every
page fault, that takes mmap_sem... that's got to impact scaling)
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-03 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 13:53 [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 16:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 8:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 12:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-06 0:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 17:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 10:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:08 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-07-03 12:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 13:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-04 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 2:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 8:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 9:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 9:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 9:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-04 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 11:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 3:13 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2F2835.5060508@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).