From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 6th Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:37:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com> References: <20100705110542.5d98c2ee@redhat.com> <4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Juan Quintela To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61124 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752862Ab0GFNhq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:37:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200 >> Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >> - 0.13 release >> > > I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm > working on it now. Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0. What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest? Kevin