From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 6th Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4C334B7F.7070108@redhat.com> References: <20100705110542.5d98c2ee@redhat.com> <4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com> <4C33354E.7080803@codemonkey.ws> <4C3337FB.5060808@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Luiz Capitulino To: Markus Armbruster Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44016 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752106Ab0GFP2L (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:28:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 06.07.2010 17:19, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > Kevin Wolf writes: > >> Am 06.07.2010 15:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> On 07/06/2010 08:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>>> Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>>> >>>>> On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200 >>>>>> Juan Quintela wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> - 0.13 release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm >>>>> working on it now. Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0. >>>>> >>>> What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't >>>> strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest? >>>> >>> >>> Last week? >> >> Sure, but it didn't happen then and things have moved forward. >> >>> I'd really like to put out -rc0 today and I'm trying to free up time to >>> get through the backlog of patches to make that happen. I just pushed >>> your latest pull. If you've got another pull request ready send it >>> now. But I can't promise that I'll take anything that hasn't already >>> shown up. >> >> I'm just reviewing and merging v2 of Markus' block fixes/cleanups and >> I'm considering the Sheepdog block driver (which seems to have had >> enough iterations and doesn't touch a single line of code outside its >> own file). > > Any chance to get the next series (Split ide-drive and scsi-disk qdevs, > and more) as well? 1-3/8 are bug fixes, and 4/8 removes unreliable > information from info block; wanted in .13. 5-8/8 could be punted to > .14. If it's purely bug fixes, I think we can still take it after -rc0. Kevin