From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache()
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:05:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C39C1AB.6000606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C330A37.8080709@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 07/06/2010 01:49 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Introduce this function to topup prefetch cache
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 3dcd55d..cda4587 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ module_param(oos_shadow, bool, 0644);
> }
> #endif
>
> +#define PTE_PREFETCH_NUM 16
>
Let's make it 8 to start with... It's frightening enough.
(8 = one cache line in both guest and host)
> @@ -316,15 +318,16 @@ static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
> }
> }
>
> -static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> - struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min)
> +static int __mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> + struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min,
> + int max, gfp_t flags)
> {
> void *obj;
>
> if (cache->nobjs>= min)
> return 0;
> - while (cache->nobjs< ARRAY_SIZE(cache->objects)) {
> - obj = kmem_cache_zalloc(base_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + while (cache->nobjs< max) {
> + obj = kmem_cache_zalloc(base_cache, flags);
> if (!obj)
> return -ENOMEM;
> cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = obj;
> @@ -332,6 +335,20 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
> + struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min)
> +{
> + return __mmu_topup_memory_cache(cache, base_cache, min,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(cache->objects), GFP_KERNEL);
> +}
> +
> +static int pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return __mmu_topup_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_rmap_desc_cache,
> + rmap_desc_cache, PTE_PREFETCH_NUM,
> + PTE_PREFETCH_NUM, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +}
> +
>
Just make the ordinary topup sufficient for prefetch. If we allocate
too much, we don't lose anything, the memory remains for the next time
around.
Note for shadow pages or pte chains you don't need extra pages, since
the prefetch fits in just one shadow page. You only need extra for rmap.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-11 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 10:44 [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch' Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] export __get_user_pages_fast() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch' Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 15:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-06 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 11:22 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-07-06 11:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-09 1:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 2:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 12:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 13:05 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-07-12 3:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 4:21 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 4:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 5:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 5:48 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 6:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 6:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 6:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 7:45 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-06 10:50 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:51 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between fetch and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 19:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 1:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 13:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 13:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 13:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 14:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 15:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-06 10:52 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 2:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 13:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C39C1AB.6000606@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).