From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:17:31 +0800 Message-ID: <4C3BBEAB.8030608@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4C330918.6040709@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C330A00.50108@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C39C030.6080009@redhat.com> <4C3A8435.4050805@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C3B0A58.5050009@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM list To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C3B0A58.5050009@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: >>> >> I think it's better that handle the reset pages in the slot, for example, >> we expect 16 pages are consecutive, but only 12 pages in the slot, the >> better >> way is handle the reset 12 pages not throw those away. > > It will almost never happen, let's remove edge cases. > OK, will update it.