From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:38:00 +0300 Message-ID: <4C3BEDA8.5070507@redhat.com> References: <20100712215722.GI14017@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4C3B922D.8040607@codemonkey.ws> <4C3B927A.4020901@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23172 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032Ab0GMEiL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:38:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3B927A.4020901@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> 0.13 ;-) >> >> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? >> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? > > Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance > out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). Casual users starting 64-way guests? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.