From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300 Message-ID: <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com> References: <4C3BED6C.20601@redhat.com> <4C3C0E5C.50902@aurel32.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel To: Aurelien Jarno Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11875 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751066Ab0GMHky (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:40:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3C0E5C.50902@aurel32.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Avi Kivity a =E9crit : > =20 >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> =20 >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >>> >>> =20 >> 0.12.n+1 >> >> =20 > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. > > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can = do > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so th= at > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days > are needed in addition). > =20 Thanks. I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable=20 branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or=20 data integrity fixes). --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function