From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:01:22 +0300 Message-ID: <4C3C9BE2.5010200@redhat.com> References: <4C3BED6C.20601@redhat.com> <4C3C0E5C.50902@aurel32.net> <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com> <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aurelien Jarno , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32083 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756807Ab0GMREL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:04:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >> data integrity fixes). > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > master releases? > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable to users. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function