From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:48:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4C3CA6F7.10405@redhat.com> References: <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws> <4C3C9BE2.5010200@redhat.com> <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , kvm-devel , Aurelien Jarno , Juan Quintela To: Brian Jackson Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30584 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751996Ab0GMRs4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:48:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote: > >> Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have >> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable >> to users. >> > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. > An email should suffice to get things merged. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.