Re: KVM timekeeping fixes, V2

Zachary Amsden
2010-07-16T17:20:32Z

On 07/16/2010 03:19 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:25:20PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>> Discovered brammage in patches due to unresolved merge.
>> Also, had to move 09/18 past 08/18 to resolve compile issue.
>>
> Have you tested this patchset with Nested SVM? We had TSC handling
> related bugs there in the past and should make sure to keep it working.
>

I've been very careful to keep nested SVM safe, but I've not got a good
test for that. Is there any test suite for the nested case?

It took a lot of guessing to figure out why it works and why the code
looks imbalanced, but I now understand the way it is now is logical and
correct.