From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] kvm, faster and simpler version of get_user_page_and_protection() Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:18:04 +0300 Message-ID: <4C430D1C.3060203@redhat.com> References: <4C3FC03A.9040504@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti To: Lai Jiangshan , Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56726 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755240Ab0GROSN (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:18:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3FC03A.9040504@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/16/2010 05:13 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > a light weight version of get_user_page_and_protection() > > > @@ -375,3 +374,83 @@ slow_irqon: > return ret; > } > } > + > +/* > + * get a current mapped page fast, and test whether the page is writable. > + * equivalent version(but slower): > + * { > + * struct page *page[1]; > + * > + * if (__get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 1, page) == 1) { > + * *writable = 1; > + * return page[0]; > + * } > + * if (__get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 0, page) == 1) { > + * *writable = 0; > + * return page[0]; > + * } > + * return NULL; > + * } > + */ > +struct page *get_user_page_and_protection(unsigned long addr, int *writable) > +{ > > > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_user_page_and_protection); > + > This a duplication of __get_user_pages_fast(), no? I think a better way is to have a __get_user_pages_ptes(..., struct page *pages, pte_t *ptes, ...), and write __get_user_pages_fast() in terms of that. There's lots of useful info from the pte we can use: - writeable bit (used here) - page size (we can stick it in some user bits, speeds up host_mapping_level()) - dirty bit (if set, we can set it for speculative sptes and save the CPU a RMW) - page attribute (for device assignment, when snooping is not available) Nick, is __get_user_pages_ptes() fine with you? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function