From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative
 path
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:39:23 +0300
Message-ID: <4C473EDB.6030906@redhat.com>
References: <4C3FCFD7.5070005@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C464102.8020205@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21102 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751170Ab0GUSja (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:39:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4C464102.8020205@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 07/21/2010 03:36 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>    
>> In the speculative path, we should check guest pte's reserved bits just as
>> the real processor does
>>
>>      
> Ping......?
>    

Sorry.  All looks good.  I think no change is needed to patch 3, if we 
agree on this I'll apply it as is.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.