From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: Balachandar <bala1486@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala.sridhar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Virtio network performance poorer than emulated e1000
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:44:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4D914A.60703@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4D46BC.2060106@redhat.com>
26.07.2010 11:26, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 07/24/10 17:04, Balachandar wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Jes Sorensen<Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Actually i got better results when i downloaded qemu-kvm 0.12.4 from
>> sourceforge and ran it. Now virtio performs better than emaulated
>> e1000 with our own simple ping-pong latency tests. Previously i used
>> Debian squeeze kvm package and i got poor results for virtio. I used
>> vhost-net as described by the kvm
>> website.http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/VhostNet. This also seem to have
>> the same problems i faced with Debian kvm package. How are you guyz
>> using vhost? Is there any other way to use vhost?
>
> Ok thats good to hear. Sounds like the Debian package might be dodgy, or
> they just happened to snapshot at a bad time.
I wonder which version it is - the "debian package". Are we talking
about kvm-72 from debian lenny perhaps?
Current version is 0.12.4-1, which is upstream 0.12.4-1 with a few
bugfixes (such as >1Tb block device corruption). I'm not sure how
that one might be "dogdy" or snapshotted at a bad time.
Thanks!
/mjt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 23:53 Virtio network performance poorer than emulated e1000 Balachandar
2010-07-23 0:18 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2010-07-23 1:31 ` Balachandar
2010-07-23 7:11 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-07-24 15:04 ` Balachandar
2010-07-26 8:26 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-07-26 13:44 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2010-07-26 14:39 ` Balachandar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-22 20:13 Balachandar
2010-07-22 21:28 ` Freddie Cash
2010-07-23 13:37 ` Sebastian Hetze
[not found] ` <20100723133731.32ED2B0016@mail.linux-ag.de>
2010-07-23 14:47 ` Balachandar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4D914A.60703@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=bala1486@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samudrala.sridhar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox