public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: dbareiro@gmx.net, KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Swap usage with KVM
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C571D23.3040802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100802185705.GJ21963@defiant.freesoftware>

On 08/02/2010 02:57 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi, Rik.
>
> On Sunday, 11 July 2010 17:49:43 -0400,
> Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>>>> I have an installation with Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.4 amd64 with
>>>> qemu-kvm 0.12.3 compiled with the source code obtained from the
>>>> official site of KVM and Linux 2.6.32.12 compiled from source code
>>>> of kernel.org. All this is installed on an HP Proliant DL380 G6 with
>>>> two Xeon E5530 quadcore processors and 16 GiB of RAM which has two
>>>> VMs with the following configuration of memory:
>>>>
>>>> Hostname       |      RAM
>>>> ===============+===============
>>>> Aps4           |    7 GiB
>>>> Leela          |    7 GiB
>>>> ===============+===============
>>>> TOTAL          |   14 GiB
>>>>
>>>> Initially the host was created with a swap partition of 1 GiB, but
>>>> today we found that the use of swap quickly began to grow
>>>> increasingly.  Therefore, as a contingency, we had to hot-add a
>>>> logical volume of 1 GB of swap on the VMHost. Is 'normal' this use
>>>> of memory?
>
>> That depends on what is going on in the host.
>>
>> Did you notice any performance issues in the guest when you started
>> using swap?
>
> After the logical volume of 1 GB that I added when I found this problem
> (being the operating system with 2 GB), I added other 3 GB to have a
> little more margin, but today I got again a new alert of Nagios:
>
>
> Swap usage     WARNING    [...]    SWAP WARNING - 30% free   (1490 MB out of 5052 MB)
>
>
> I don't see performance issue in the VMs.
>
> Marcelo Tosatti recommended me to apply the EPT patch
> (6316e1c8c6af6ccb55ff8564231710660608f46c). Should it be safe for use in
> production? Are there plans that this patch is applied on some version
> of Linux stable?

Yes, that patch is safe and definitely recommended.

-- 
All rights reversed

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-02 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-11 15:12 Swap usage with KVM Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-11 19:12 ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-11 21:49   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-02 18:57     ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-02 19:31       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2010-08-02 19:52         ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-02 20:22           ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-02 21:43             ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-27 10:04             ` Swap usage with KVM (and KSM) Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-27 13:42               ` Rik van Riel
2010-07-11 21:05 ` Swap usage with KVM Freddie Cash
2010-07-11 22:08   ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-20 15:04     ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-20 19:18     ` David Weber
2010-07-22 10:09       ` Daniel Bareiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C571D23.3040802@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dbareiro@gmx.net \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox