From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: put register operand write back to a function
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:55:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C68FD1B.3070101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C689B56.4000405@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 08/16/2010 04:58 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>
>> It's cleaner to take val and bytes from struct operand, and do the
>> assignment from the callers, no?
>>
> take val and bytes from struct operand may have other issue, when we
> writeback
> the source register, we need do the assignment from the caller, and then
> change
> the val back before write src val to dst val. Such as xadd:
> c->src.val = c->dst.val;
> write_register_operand(&c->src);
> c->src.val = c->src.orig_val;
> goto add;
Or avoid the 'goto add'. XADD is not ADD.
write_register_operand(struct operand *) is easy to understand. With the
two additional arguments it becomes confusing since it uses some parts
of the operand but ignores others.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 13:38 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: put register operand write back to a function Wei Yongjun
2010-08-12 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86 emulator: add XADD instruction emulation Wei Yongjun
2010-08-12 15:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-08-13 5:13 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Wei Yongjun
2010-08-13 5:32 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Wei Yongjun
2010-08-15 11:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86 emulator: put register operand write back to a function Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4C689B56.4000405@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-08-16 8:55 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C68FD1B.3070101@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).