From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"gleb@redhat.com" <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Disable GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI flag before injecting NMI to guest on VMX
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:58:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C77C49A.9000600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C779C3D.2070700@siemens.com>
On 08/27/2010 02:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 08/27/2010 11:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> AMD does not differentiate between MOV-SS and STI interrupt shadows.
>>>
>>> But AMD has its own NMI problems as it does not allow to trap after
>>> IRET-from-NMI and requires magic dances which are partly broken in KVM.
>>> I'm leaning towards NMI window emulation via the workaround we use for
>>> older Intel CPUs without NMI window trapping as well.
>> Can you elaborate?
> Basically the issues you found regarding our single-step-based
> workaround.
I forgot them already. What was that, exception during IRET?
> Moreover, we cannot easily prevent that TF set by the NMI
> code leaks onto the guest's stack.
>
> Jörg and I stuck heads together about this during LinuxCon. We came to
> the conclusion that we either have to emulate the instruction that
> delays NMIs (ie. _every_ possible instruction for the interrupt shadow
> case) or fall back to the VMX workaround based on interrupt window
> trapping and an emergency timeout (much simpler, but not really correct).
I'd really like to avoid the timer. But I forgot all the details around
this, I'll have to re-learn them so I can actually compare the two options.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-26 20:06 [PATCH 0/1] Disable GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI flag before injecting NMI to VMX guest Jes.Sorensen
2010-08-26 20:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] Disable GUEST_INTR_STATE_STI flag before injecting NMI to guest on VMX Jes.Sorensen
2010-08-27 8:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 8:31 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-27 8:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 9:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 11:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 13:58 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-08-27 14:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 15:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 16:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-29 8:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 9:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 11:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 13:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 14:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 11:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-27 11:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 11:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-27 11:04 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-27 11:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-27 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 9:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-27 9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 9:56 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-27 9:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-27 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C77C49A.9000600@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox