From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernelshark plugins and ftrace array fields
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:08:17 +0300
Message-ID: <4C8341E1.7050605@redhat.com>
References: <4C7F9639.7000804@redhat.com>	 <1283437521.2356.136.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4C7FB603.60609@redhat.com>	 <1283451398.2356.360.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>	 <1283452736.2356.388.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1283455443.2356.433.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1283455443.2356.433.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

  On 09/02/2010 10:24 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> I just pushed out the changes and my new example looks like this:
>
> static int
> kvm_emulate_insn_handler(struct trace_seq *s, struct record *record,
>                           struct event_format *event, void *context)
> {
>          unsigned char *data;
>          int len;
>          int i;
>
>          data = pevent_get_field_raw(s, event, "insn", record,
>                                      &len, 1);
>          if (!data)
>                  return -1;
>
>          trace_seq_puts(s, "insn: ");
>          for (i = 0; i<  len; i++) {
>                  trace_seq_printf(s, "%s%02x",
>                                   i ? "," : "",
>                                   data[i]);
>          }
>
>          return 0;
> }
>

That looks perfect.  But on which branch can I find it?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.