From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Sept 21
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:50:55 +0200
Message-ID: <4C9790EF.9030505@redhat.com>
References: <20100920164445.GN19949@x200.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Nadav Har'El" <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>,
	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57574 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756929Ab0ITQvP (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:51:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100920164445.GN19949@x200.localdomain>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

  On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>

nested vmx: the resurrection.  Nice to see it progressing again, but 
there's still a lot of ground to cover.  Perhaps we can involve Intel to 
speed things up?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function