From: Arjan Koers <0h61vkll2ly8@xutrox.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:49:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA4DBC8.6070606@xutrox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA4AD87.8060502@redhat.com>
On 2010-09-30 17:32, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 05:12 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 30.09.2010 17:54, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> []
>>
>>> The printk movement is just a bandaid patch, correct? Anything which
>>> does printk before kvmclock is registered could trigger the same bug.
>>>
>> Well, I'd not say it's just a bandaid patch, it's real bug -- either
>> we can read kvmclock (so it's initialized), or we don't touch it (at
>> least before registration).
>>
>
> Yes, that's the bug, but moving the printk doesn't fix that, it just
> hides it.
Correct. It's just luck that it works for my 64-bit 2.6.34.* and
2.6.35.* kernels. The working kernels will break when compiled to
print additional debug information.
Here's a partial boot log of 2.6.32.23 with smpboot.c compiled
with DEBUG define. I modified printk to display the CPU# (printk_cpu).
All lines on CPU 1 up to 0.136487 are using the invalid clock and
will cause the kernel to hang later (if I hadn't patched pvclock
to correct the clock backwards).
...
[0: 0.124221] Booting processor 1 APIC 0x1 ip 0x6000
[0: 0.124579] Setting warm reset code and vector.
[0: 0.124585] 1.
[0: 0.124587] 2.
[0: 0.124588] 3.
[0: 0.124601] Asserting INIT.
[0: 0.124613] Waiting for send to finish...
[0: 0.134490] Deasserting INIT.
[0: 0.134497] Waiting for send to finish...
[0: 0.134501] #startup loops: 2.
[0: 0.134503] Sending STARTUP #1.
[0: 0.134508] After apic_write.
[1: 0.008000] Initializing CPU#1
[1: 0.008000] CPU#1 (phys ID: 1) waiting for CALLOUT
[0: 0.134826] Startup point 1.
[0: 0.135133] Waiting for send to finish...
[0: 0.135340] Sending STARTUP #2.
[0: 0.135346] After apic_write.
[0: 0.135650] Startup point 1.
[0: 0.135651] Waiting for send to finish...
[0: 0.135858] After Startup.
[0: 0.135859] Before Callout 1.
[0: 0.135861] After Callout 1.
[1: 0.008000] CALLIN, before setup_local_APIC().
[1: 0.008000] Stack at about ffff88001f889f44
[1: 0.008000] CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
[1: 0.008000] CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
[1: 0.008000] kvm-clock: cpu 1, msr 0:1511601, secondary cpu clock
[0: 0.136461] OK.
[0: 0.136463] CPU1: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240 Processor stepping 02
[0: 0.136465] CPU has booted.
[0: 0.136488] Brought up 2 CPUs
[0: 0.136489] Boot done.
[0: 0.136490] Before bogomips.
[0: 0.136491] Total of 2 processors activated (11202.17 BogoMIPS).
[0: 0.136493] Before bogocount - setting activated=1.
[1: 0.136487] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 1, old 0x0, new 0x7010600070106
[0: 0.144007] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
[0: 0.144010] domain 0: span 0-1 level CPU
[0: 0.144012] groups: 0 1
[0: 0.144016] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
[0: 0.144018] domain 0: span 0-1 level CPU
[0: 0.144020] groups: 1 0
[0: 0.144219] NET: Registered protocol family 16
[0: 0.148091] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
[0: 0.148451] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for extended access
[0: 0.148870] mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent variable MTRR settings
[0: 0.148870] mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent MTRRdefType settings
[0: 0.148870] mtrr: probably your BIOS does not setup all CPUs.
[0: 0.149185] mtrr: corrected configuration.
[0: 0.156112] bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0
[0: 0.156635] vgaarb: loaded
[0: 0.156635] PCI: Probing PCI hardware
[0: 0.156635] PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
[0: 0.156635] pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 20 io port: [0xc000-0xc00f]
[0: 0.156773] pci 0000:00:01.3: quirk: region b000-b03f claimed by PIIX4 ACPI
[0: 0.160012] pci 0000:00:01.3: quirk: region b100-b10f claimed by PIIX4 SMB
[0: 0.163379] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 10 32bit mmio pref: [0xf0000000-0xf1ffffff]
[0: 0.164660] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xf2000000-0xf2000fff]
[0: 0.170537] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 10 io port: [0xc020-0xc03f]
[0: 0.170629] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xf2001000-0xf2001fff]
[0: 0.171037] pci 0000:00:04.0: reg 10 io port: [0xc040-0xc05f]
[0: 0.171373] pci 0000:00:05.0: reg 10 io port: [0xc080-0xc0bf]
[0: 0.172273] pci 0000:00:06.0: reg 10 io port: [0xc0c0-0xc0ff]
[0: 0.173099] vgaarb: device added: PCI:0000:00:02.0,decodes=io+mem,owns=io+mem,locks=none
[0: 0.176131] pci 0000:00:01.0: PIIX/ICH IRQ router [8086:7000]
[0: 0.177112] Switching to clocksource kvm-clock
[1: 0.181401] pci_bus 0000:00: resource 0 io: [0x00-0xffff]
[1: 0.181412] pci_bus 0000:00: resource 1 mem: [0x000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
[1: 0.181825] NET: Registered protocol family 2
...
>>> Can you try with printk timing disabled and see if the bug disappears?
>>>
>> Yes it disappears so far, at last I can't trigger it anymore, tried
>> numerous boots including the 2.6.35.6 32bit kernel (patched with the
>> printk registration patch!) which shows the prob in almost every boot.
>>
>
> So, looks like we need to do the real fix.
Your ideas to zero hv_clock or to use an initialized flag may be usable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-30 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 12:53 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests Andre Przywara
2010-07-25 8:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-26 8:47 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-26 18:59 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-27 21:00 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-28 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-31 0:34 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-31 1:38 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-07-31 11:50 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-31 2:39 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-07-31 11:53 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-31 16:36 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-31 19:45 ` Arjan Koers
2010-07-31 23:55 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-08-02 14:43 ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-02 16:16 ` Arjan Koers
2010-08-02 18:07 ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-02 20:26 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-08-02 21:10 ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-02 21:35 ` Arjan Koers
2010-08-03 0:00 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-09-28 11:16 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-29 8:12 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-29 8:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-29 9:17 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-29 9:19 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-29 19:26 ` Arjan Koers
2010-09-30 7:55 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-30 9:59 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-30 13:54 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-09-30 15:12 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-30 15:32 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-09-30 18:49 ` Arjan Koers [this message]
2010-09-30 19:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-09-30 20:16 ` Arjan Koers
2010-09-30 23:02 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-09-30 23:07 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-01 1:13 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-02 5:35 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-02 7:35 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-02 7:40 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-02 7:50 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-02 16:10 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-02 20:26 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-02 23:42 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-03 8:27 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-08 0:12 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-08 2:47 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-08 22:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-10-09 1:10 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-09 2:27 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-09 6:29 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-09 8:59 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-11 20:47 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-13 12:18 ` Glauber Costa
2010-10-10 1:20 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-11 17:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-11 18:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-10-09 2:29 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-10 1:26 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-20 20:47 ` Arjan Koers
2010-10-09 7:59 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-09 8:31 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-02 21:55 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-10-03 8:16 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-10-03 8:22 ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-03 8:30 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-07-27 10:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 11:49 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-27 12:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 12:21 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-27 12:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 13:48 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-27 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 14:55 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-27 21:51 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-28 3:00 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-07-28 7:55 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-28 12:25 ` Andre Przywara
2010-07-30 22:54 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-08-02 10:12 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CA4DBC8.6070606@xutrox.com \
--to=0h61vkll2ly8@xutrox.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox