From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:22:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA83D62.8060406@redhat.com> References: <4CA2F8A3.80400@redhat.com> <4CA30424.9030007@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA30493.6090503@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA392FE.5090009@xutrox.com> <4CA4427C.9090304@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA45F7B.8050806@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA4968F.9050402@redhat.com> <4CA4A8C5.3030407@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA4AD87.8060502@redhat.com> <4CA4DBC8.6070606@xutrox.com> <20100930190507.GA1111@amt.cnet> <4CA51715.1070507@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA51847.5060208@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA6C4BB.5020004@redhat.com> <4CA6E0BF.90605@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA7AA38.1080005@redhat.com> <4CA83BEC.9020701@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Zachary Amsden , Marcelo Tosatti , Arjan Koers <0h61vkll2ly8@xutrox.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa , Andre Przywara , jeremy@xensource.com To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37835 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752358Ab0JCIXJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2010 04:23:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CA83BEC.9020701@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/03/2010 10:16 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > I just booted this same guest using kvm-0.12.5 - using that one > guest does not report unstable tsc, yet does not list it in the > available_clocksources. It also shows time jumps: > > ... > [0;0/0: 0.000000] Detected 3217.424 MHz processor. > [0;0/0: 0.006666] Calibrating delay loop (skipped) preset value.. 6437.96 BogoMIPS (lpj=10724746) > [0;0/0: 0.006666] pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 > [0;0/0: 0.006666] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 > [0;0/0: 0.006765] Initializing cgroup subsys ns > ... > [0;0/0: 0.029999] Booting Node 0, Processors #1 Ok. > [1;0/0: 0.006666] Initializing CPU#1 > [1;0/0: 0.006666] kvm-clock: cpu 1, msr 0:1e0a0c1, secondary cpu clock > [0;0/0: 0.058342] Brought up 2 CPUs > ... Most likely it's still using jiffies while the clocks are being set up. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.