From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] Add async PF initialization to PV guest. Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:44:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4CB0B803.3040008@redhat.com> References: <1286207794-16120-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1286207794-16120-8-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <4CADC229.9040402@redhat.com> <20101008075414.GB8354@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, riel@redhat.com, cl@linux-foundation.org, mtosatti@redhat.com To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101008075414.GB8354@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/08/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > >+ > > >+static void kvm_guest_cpu_notify(void *dummy) > > >+{ > > >+ if (!dummy) > > >+ kvm_guest_cpu_init(); > > >+ else > > >+ kvm_pv_disable_apf(NULL); > > >+} > > > > Why are you making decisions based on a dummy input? > > > > The whole thing looks strange. Use two functions? > > > What is so strange? Type of notification is passed as a parameter. > The code that does this is just under the function. I can rename > dummy to something else. Or make it two functions. Two separate functions is simplest. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org