From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan Koers <0h61vkll2ly8@xutrox.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:20:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4CB114C6.5000903@xutrox.com> References: <4CA4DBC8.6070606@xutrox.com> <20100930190507.GA1111@amt.cnet> <4CA51715.1070507@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA51847.5060208@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA6C4BB.5020004@redhat.com> <4CA6E0BF.90605@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CA75969.1080405@xutrox.com> <4CA7C34C.4040000@redhat.com> <4CAE6203.6040902@xutrox.com> <4CAE862F.10904@redhat.com> <20101008220600.GA9430@amt.cnet> <4CAFC11B.8010603@xutrox.com> <4CAFD327.3030608@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Michael Tokarev , Avi Kivity , Glauber Costa , Andre Przywara To: Zachary Amsden Return-path: Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.177]:36610 "EHLO smtp-out2.tiscali.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756555Ab0JJBUa (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2010 21:20:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CAFD327.3030608@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2010-10-09 04:27, Zachary Amsden wrote: ... > There's a lot of work I've done and also a lot of work done by Glauber > Costa on kvmclock that recently went upstream. > > It's unlikely that you'll be bug free without all of those patches > applied; most of the patches were not just enhancements, but contained > bugfixes as well as improved operation conditions. On top of this, the > patches are highly interdependent because of close code proximity. I > suggest applying the following commits to your branch (newest listed > first; apply in reverse order): > > 12b1164fa498997bf72070e6a81418197e283716 ... > 3e05d29fe45508625e2a73db3d1bfb54f30731ff I've tried applying these commits to 2.6.32.24, but gave up after a while, because some were just too different to make it work (e.g. 91308e2fecddb6fc63feaf4cef3400f5cbea6619).